Submitted by Manal on Thu, 13/01/2005 - 20:43.
( categories: Website )

I think it is time to discuss the license for EGLUG content.

Should we use one license on all the content or different licenses??

What licenses should we use? one of Creative Commons ?? or FDL or something else??

I'm starting this discussion because I want to use the case study (about the egyptian cloth company that runs on FOSS) in Center for Knowledge Society arabic e-newsletter, and I think we should have a general rule for the use of EGLUG content, so we wont need to discuss it everytime someone wants to use our content.


DarKnesS_WolF's picture
Submitted by DarKnesS_WolF on Thu, 13/01/2005 - 21:21.

i guess anyhow it`s should be free.. i took a fast look at the 2 license and i guess Creative Commons Noncommercial is good. and i didn`t real read all of FDL yet.but i`ll soon.

peace


Live Free Or Die...


Submitted by MLAw on Fri, 14/01/2005 - 03:47.

Well its realy important thing I have read both licenses I think Creative commons is better specialy Attribution one I think we dont care if others used our content but at least refer back to us :):)

Submitted by NewComer on Fri, 14/01/2005 - 15:59.

I was just wondering about that the other day and thought we should start a discussion. This needs careful reading of both licenses. Whatever we choose, a new member should agree upon registration that any content he contributes to EGLUG is by default under that license unless he explicitly specifies other license when contributing with a specific piece of content. Or include a note or a link on the "create content" page.

YoussefAssad's picture
Submitted by YoussefAssad on Fri, 14/01/2005 - 16:38.

Actually, you raise a good point. I think that the license we choose should not be optional and should apply sitewide.

Someone could otherwise create content and then place it under a restrictive license, under which circumstances eglug would implicitly be forced to support this by hosting it.

-- Panem et *burp* circenses


Alaa's picture
Submitted by Alaa on Fri, 14/01/2005 - 19:54.

by default licensing sounds like a good idea to me, and off course it should be a Free/Open license.

however I think it will be difficult to agree on whether to use a copyleft license or not.

there are situations when I think we should absolutly not use a copyleft license, like for instance if we make a press release or a press kit, you want people to reuse that in any possible way.

on the other hand if I spend time writing a long document I would only want it published with a copyleft license, if copyleft is not an option then my non casual content would probably end up on my website and only links will be posted to eglug.

so how about we give people a choice of two licenses, one copyleft and one not, with one of them being default.

or even better, the choice would only be available to articles and wikipages but not to comments, forum posts or news items?

tab3an there is a whole other problem which is derivative work, translated material for instance has to abide by the original license, we need to make sure that correct license info is published and not just stick our own default.

cheers, Alaa


http://www.manalaa.net

"i`m feeling for the 2nd time like alice in wonderland reading el wafd"


whirlpool's picture
Submitted by whirlpool on Fri, 14/01/2005 - 22:57.

like here

...Create a taxonomy called "License" and create a term for each license you have. The taxonomy description could be a short description of the license (think Creative Commons) and a link to the full legal license (again, think Creative Commons). Than whenever you post a work, select the license it goes under.

so we got several selectable cc licenses for everything and the default one is the site wide agreed upon license.


Alaa's picture
Submitted by Alaa on Fri, 14/01/2005 - 23:49.

its the decision on which licenses to use that is a problem.

cheers, Alaa


http://www.manalaa.net "i`m feeling for the 2nd time like alice in wonderland reading el wafd"


whirlpool's picture
Submitted by whirlpool on Fri, 14/01/2005 - 19:56.

well i think in blog spaces, seniors can select any of the creative commons choices.

outside blogs its a single (by-sa*) license. May be a (by) only license occasionally for stuff that we might want to be consumed by the media like our about page, faq, press kit etc..

  • by == attribution
  • sa == share alike

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.