EGLUG the peace and tolerance.

Conceptor's picture
Submitted by Conceptor on Tue, 15/02/2005 - 5:30am.
::

There is nothing called fight caused by the Election ,discussions show how healthy this community is, the community as whole is meant to be healthy with all it's targets ,not only for the administration-ship election .

Quoted from my previous comment

I think it is courtesy not to be candidate .as administrators should resume the vision.

what meant by this is totally accept the current. before the current election

Alaa's Reply

it is courtsy to offer the community choice, if they choose the current admins thats cool, if they choose others thats also cool, whats not cool is to limit their choice.

so my name as candidate is courtesy for the community namely as choice .

it is not to be an administrator.

but once anyone intend to be nominee for this election it should end on right basis as also ending the courtesy in beneficial manners to all community members . I am saying anyone cause if I was not part of this for sure I will leave my comment.

someone will ask in brilliance lookin-eyes why there was no such this long 40 comment forum in moderators election ?

The Answer is the key point here comparing the result between the ending time and the announcement time the, result was intact.

Q So why do you accept to extent the headache-election to 14 days(2 weeks). as poll?

I didn't accept some thing like this ,and i don't have the right to say NO,simply because three of moderators decide to do poll.and if you refer to the announcementyou will find the poll is the extension of wrong decision .so the poll is invalid IMHO because it's based on wrong actions.

some members said "it is mega-wasting-time" yeah do proper thing.

but when our forum took the shape of Court room . it is bad , it's really bad.

I will accept the result revision 3 if doing the thing on rules will make FIGHT the purpose is not to fight and it's not Admin alias.the purpose is doing the thing right ,if any purpose will cause something bad to the lug then we should make the proper priority for our discussions and targtes.

After reviewing the charter and it's all related topics i found :

At the moment all eglug.org resources are donated by Alaa, MadFarmAnimalz, Uniball, WhirlPool and ezabi, later to avoid concentrating too much power a wider group of members should contribute in paying.

link the two quotes

Number of Administrators shall be 4 or 20% the number of moderators (whichever is larger).

then if I called the courtesy thing (which i talked about previously) then ezabi should be one of the current administrators before the election. but due to the charter restriction he was not(my guess ).

Then it makes sense for me not to do the thing on right basis cause it's ezabi's right.and clear the word fight which for the first time i find it @ EGLUG.