Manal and Alaa's bit bucket free speech from the bletches

I'm commenting from where computers have not been granted the godly gift of typing in Arabic; so bear with me.

I don't see how the questions are necessarily implying that blogs are being infiltrated!

These questions can also be perceived as those of someone who sees something too good to be true, or someone who wants to really be assured before having faith in something, specially among a people whom are infested with remote agency and accusations of treason.

It is still a dumb approach by the journal[ist] because, as has been said elsewhere, even if some bloggers are state security agents: SO WHAT! We're not like THEM. We don't strife to "cleanse ourselves" as someone commented down here.

Should we be questioning the intentions of journalists?

I say either take them at face value and answer them cleverly with a wishful shot at enlightment as everyone who answered here so far did, or simply ignore them. In all cases assume they are STUPID by profession.

I'm not completely ruling out the possibility of premeditated bad intention; I'm just giving the STUPID the benefit of the doubt.

Please have the liberty to reply in Arabic. Hopefully I will have returned to the blessed land of the righteous to answer back...maybe.