no you don't get it, the

no you don't get it, the book title did not mislead me, I had a preconcieved notion of what the book would be like based on the promotion the publisher did, the text on the jacket of the book etc.

it was the message around the book and not the book title, the article (whose title Idid not choose btw) was clearly packages as a book review of this particular book, on this blog, on the print edition of the magazine, slightly less obvious on the web edition of the magazine though.

and whatever your intentions the book is still about blogging and your statement said it's a book not even about blogging.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You may link to images on this site using a special syntax
  • WikiText is converted to HTML (supported WikiText formatting will show in the long tip format).
  • You may write mixed Arabic and English freely, line direction will be computed automaticaly

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.